Julgamentos metacognitivos de domínio específico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/edu.2023.26.3.2Palavras-chave:
Ciências da saúde, cognição, crenças ontológicas, decisão, raciocínioResumo
Os julgamentos metacognitivos têm sido epistemologicamente vinculados às crenças do sujeito com relação à sua origem na experiência, no conhecimento e na fluência do aprendizado. Com outra visão, a didática pode estudar julgamentos de domínio específico de acordo com as particularidades de cada uma das ciências. Objetivo: explorar os julgamentos metacognitivos por meio da análise de conteúdo nos discursos de estudantes de medicina em uma universidade pública da Colômbia. Métodos: foi utilizada uma metodologia qualitativa descritiva para explorar os julgamentos metacognitivos em simulações clínicas de tarefas que envolvem raciocínio clínico. Discussão dos resultados: os resultados mostram dois julgamentos metacognitivos específicos do raciocínio clínico: julgamentos de recapitulação e julgamentos com hipóteses, além de julgamentos baseados em crenças ontológicas. Conclusão: o estudo nos permite delinear uma taxonomia de julgamentos metacognitivos de domínio específico que incluem crenças epistêmicas e ontológicas.
Downloads
Referências
Berríos Molina, C. (2019). Creencias epistémicas, metacognición y cambio conceptual. Revista de Estudios y Experiencias en Educación, 18(37), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.21703/rexe.20191837berrios3
Brentnall, J., Thackray, D. y Judd, B. (2022). Evaluating the clinical reasoning of student health professionals in placement and simulation settings: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020936
Caziot, B. y Mamassian, P. (2021). Perceptual confidence judgments reflect self-consistency. Journal of Vision, 21(12), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.12.8
Chiffi, D. y Zanotti, R. (2017). Fear of knowledge: Clinical hypotheses in diagnostic and prognostic reasoning. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 23(5), 928-934. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12664
Coen, M., Sader, J., Junod-Perron, N., Audétat, M. C. y Nendaz, M. (2022). Clinical reasoning in dire times. Analysis of cognitive biases in clinical cases during the Covid-19 pandemic. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 17(4), 979-988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-021-02884-9
Cong, P. y Jia, N. (2022). An event-related potential study on differences between higher and lower easy of learning judgments: Evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779907
Corrao, S. y Argano, C. (2022). Rethinking clinical decision-making to improve clinical reasoning. Frontiers in Medicine, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.900543
Davis, J. L. y Murray, J. F. (2016). History and physical examination. En Murray and Nadel’s Textbook of Respiratory Medicine, 263-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-3383-5.00016-6
Devaluez, M., Mazancieux, A. y Souchay, C. (2023). Episodic and semantic feeling-of-knowing in aging: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 16439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36251-9
Díaz, R. y Prinz, J. (2023). The role of emotional awareness in evaluative judgment: Evidence from alexithymia. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 5183. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32242-y
Dinsmore, D. L. y Parkinson, M. M. (2013). What are confidence judgments made of? Students’ explanations for their confidence ratings and what that means for calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.06.001
Dunlosky, J. y Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00509.x
Felix, H. M., Beecham, G. B. y Simon, L. V. (2022). Debriefing theories and philosophies in medical simulation. StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551632/
Fuster Guillen, D. (2019). Investigación cualitativa: método fenomenológico hermenéutico. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(1), 201-229. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n1.267
González Requena, J. y Farré, R. (2010). Para una reconstrucción genealógica y epistemológica del concepto de metacognición. Revista de Psicología, XVIX. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2010.17101
Hacker, D., Dunlosky, J. y Graesser, A. (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. Taylor y Franscis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876428
Halamish, V. y Undorf, M. (2023). Why do judgments of learning modify memory? Evidence from identical pairs and relatedness judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(4), 547-556. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001174
Hasske, E., Beil, M. y Keller, K. (2017). Competency-based education and training of medical staff. A program of the Medical Academy Waldbreitbach: Concept - Implementation - Materials. GMS Journal for Medical Education, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.3205/ZMA001118
Hastings, J., Ceusters, W., Smith, B. y Mulligan, K. (2011). Dispositions and processes in the emotion ontology. [Ponencia: International Conference on Biomedical Ontology].
Hattie, J. (2013). Calibration and confidence: Where to next? Learning and Instruction, 24(1), 62-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.009
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C. y Baptista Lucio, M. del P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (vol. 1). McGraw-Hill.
Hicks, E. P. y Kluemper, G. T. (2011). Heuristic reasoning and cognitive biases: Are they hindrances to judgments and decision making in orthodontics? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 139(3), 297-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.05.018
Hofer, B. K. y Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170620
Kelly, J., Oza, S. K., Feinn, R. y Cassese, T. (2020). Implementation of a hypothesis-driven physical exam session in a transition to clerkship program. The Journal of Teaching and Learning Resources, 16, 11043. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11043
Kozlowski, D., Hutchinson, M., Hurley, J., Rowley, J. y Sutherland, J. (2017). The role of emotion in clinical decision making: An integrative literature review. BMC Medical Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1089-7
Kunitomo, K., Harada, T. y Watari, T. (2022). Cognitive biases encountered by physicians in the emergency room. BMC Emergency Medicine, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00708-3
Lapidow, E., Killeen, I. y Walker, C. M. (2022). Learning to recognize uncertainty vs. recognizing uncertainty to learn: Confidence judgments and exploration decisions in preschoolers. Developmental Science, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13178
Liu, G., Chimowitz, H. y Isbell, L. M. (2022). Affective influences on clinical reasoning and diagnosis: insights from social psychology and new research opportunities. Diagnosis, 9(3), 295. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2021-0115
Lyyra, P. (2019). Semantics for subjective measures of perceptual experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(agosto). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01980
Martín-Luengo, B., Zinchenko, O., Dolgoarshinnaia, A. y Leminen, A. (2021). Retrospective confidence judgments: Meta‐analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 42(10), 3005. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25397
Maxwell, N. P. y Huff, M. J. (2022). Reactivity from judgments of learning is not only due to memory forecasting: evidence from associative memory and frequency judgments. Metacognition and Learning, 17(2), 589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09301-2
Mazancieux, A., Dinze, C., Souchay, C. y Moulin, C. J. A. (2020). Metacognitive domain specificity in feeling-of-knowing but not retrospective confidence. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2020(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaa001
Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 159-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x
Mirza, N. A., Akhtar-Danesh, N., Noesgaard, C., Martin, L. y Staples, E. (2014). A concept analysis of abductive reasoning. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(9), 1980-1994. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12379
Norman, E., Blakstad, O., Johnsen, Ø., Martinsen, S. K. y Price, M. C. (2016). The Relationship between feelings-of-knowing and partial knowledge for general knowledge questions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(junio). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00996
Ortega, J., Montañés, P., Barnhart, A. y Kuhn, G. (2021). Differential effects of experience and information cues on metacognitive judgments about others’ change detection abilities. I-Perception, 12(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695211039242
Ramírez Perdomo, C. A. (2016). Fenomenología hermenéutica y sus implicaciones en enfermería. Index de Enfermería, 1, 82-85. https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-12962016000100019
Saito, J. M., Kolisnyk, M. y Fukuda, K. (2023). Judgments of learning reveal conscious access to stimulus memorability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(1), 317-330. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02166-1
Salik, I. y Paige, J. T. (2023). Debriefing the interprofessional team in medical simulation. StatPearls. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554526/
Schraw, G., Kuch, F. y Gutiérrez, A. P. (2013). Measure for measure: Calibrating ten commonly used calibration scores. Learning and Instruction, 24, 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.007
Shake, M. C. y Shulley, L. J. (2014). Diferencias entre la sobre-confianza funcional y subjetiva en juicios posdicción de ejecución de pruebas. 12(33), 263-282. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.33.14005
Shaughnessy, J. J. (1979). Confidence-judgment accuracy as a predictor of test performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 13(4), 505-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(79)90012-6
Siedlecka, M., Paulewicz, B. y Wierzchoń, M. (2016). But i was so sure! Metacognitive judgments are less accurate given prospectively than retrospectively. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00218
Soteriou, M. (2017). The ontology of emotion. The Ontology of Emotions, 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1017/ 9781316275 221.005
Sox, H., Higgins, M. y Douglas, O. (2013). Medical decision making (2 ed.). John & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/ 9781118341544
Toufan, N., Omid, A. y Haghani, F. (2023). The double-edged sword of emotions in medical education: A scoping review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 12(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_644_21
Ugwu, C. V, Medows, M., Don-Pedro, D. y Chan, J. (2020). Critical event debriefing in a community hospital. Cureus, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8822
Van den Brink, N., Holbrechts, B., Brand, P. L. P., Stolper, E. C. F. y Van Royen, P. (2019). Role of intuitive knowledge in the diagnostic reasoning of hospital specialists: a focus group study. BMJ Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022724
Widner, R. L. y Smith, S. M. (1996). Feeling-of-knowing judgments from the subject’s perspective. American Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 373-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423012
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Jorge Álvarez Ríos
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Proposta de Política para Periódicos de Acesso Livre
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Esta revista e os seus artigos estão publicados com a licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Você tem o direito de compartilhar, copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato. Para que isto ocorra: você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas; você não pode usar o material para fins comerciais; e, se você remixar, transformar ou criar a partir do material, você não pode distribuir o material modificado.
