¿Qué novedades hay en la investigación sobre metacognición? Respuestas de acuerdo con la literatura actual
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5294/edu.2022.25.3.5Palabras clave:
Metacognición, autorregulación, aprendizaje, educación, revisión de literaturaResumen
Metacognition has become a key element in learning processes. Its advantages include increasing awareness of one’s cognitive processes and promoting autonomous, critical, reflective, self-regulated, and self-directed learning. Given its increasing relevance in the academic and scientific community in recent years, this article maps the evolution of metacognition using the tree metaphor to establish the main research approaches emerging today. Through a network analysis of publications in WoS and Scopus and using tools such as Bibliometrix, ToS, and Gephi, the main documents, authors, countries, journals, and fundamental lines of work in metacognition research were identified: evaluation of metacognition in children, metacognition in student education, self-regulation skills, and metacognition in mathematical performance. The results suggest that the development of metacognitive skills has migrated to specific fields such as chemistry, mathematics, and arithmetic, with the latter two showing the most progress in implementing these practices to improve learning outcomes. Additionally, the findings highlight that while teachers consider metacognition necessary for their students’ learning, they do not always have the knowledge and skills to teach and apply it effectively.
Descargas
Citas
Aldana, C., Revilla, M., Saavedra, Y., Mestanza, V., & Palacios, C. (2020). Post COVID-19 Global Macrotrends in the pedagogical practice to achieve Student Outcomes “ICACIT.” 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Accreditation of Engineering and Computing Education (ICACIT), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACIT50253.2020.9277691
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Aria, M., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research. Social Indicators Research, 149(3), 803–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3
Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326548
Baten, E., Praet, M., & Desoete, A. (2017). The relevance and efficacy of metacognition for instructional design in the domain of mathematics. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 49(4), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0851-y
Bellon, E., Fias, W., & De Smedt, B. (2019). More than number sense: The additional role of executive functions and metacognition in arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 182, 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.012
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10), P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008
Bowen, R. S., Picard, D. R., Verberne-Sutton, S., & Brame, C. J. (2018). Incorporating Student Design in an HPLC Lab Activity Promotes Student Metacognition and Argumentation. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(1), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00258
Bozgün, K., & Pekdoğan, S. (2018). The Self-Efficacy as Predictors of the Metacognition Skills in Children. Journal of Education and Future, 14, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.390814
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116).
Buitrago, S., Duque, P. L., & Robledo, S. (2019). Branding Corporativo: una revisión bibliográfica. Económicas CUC, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.17981/econcuc.41.1.2020.org.1
Byrnes, J. P., & Miller-Cotto, D. (2016). The growth of mathematics and reading skills in segregated and diverse schools: An opportunity-propensity analysis of a national database. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.04.002
Cadamuro, A., Bisagno, E., Pecini, C., & Vezzali, L. (2019). Reflecting A… “Bit.” What Relationship Between Metacognition And ICT? Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135025
Çamlıbel-Acar, Z., & Eveyik-Aydın, E. (2022). Perspectives of EFL teacher trainers and pre-service teachers on continued mandatory distance education during the pandemic. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103635
Capodieci, A., Re, A. M., Fracca, A., Borella, E., & Carretti, B. (2019). The efficacy of a training that combines activities on working memory and metacognition: Transfer and maintenance effects in children with ADHD and typical development. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 41(10), 1074–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2019.1651827
Casale, S., Musicò, A., & Spada, M. M. (2021). A systematic review of metacognitions in Internet Gaming Disorder and problematic Internet, smartphone and social networking sites use. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 28(6), 1494–1508. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2588
Castellanos, J. D. G., Hurtado, P. L. D., Barahona, L., & Peña, E. (2022). Marco de referencia y tendencias de investigación de economía colaborativa. Revista En-contexto, 10(16), 267–292. https://doi.org/10.53995/23463279.1159
Clavijo-Tapia, F. J., Duque-Hurtado, P. L., Arias-Cerquera, G., & Tolosa-Castañeda, M. A. (2021). Organizational communication: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2020. Clío América, 15(29), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897848.4311
Colthorpe, K., Sharifirad, T., Ainscough, L., Anderson, S., & Zimbardi, K. (2018). Prompting undergraduate students’ metacognition of learning: implementing “meta-learning” assessment tasks in the biomedical sciences. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1334872
Coughlin, C., Hembacher, E., Lyons, K. E., & Ghetti, S. (2015). Introspection on uncertainty and judicious help-seeking during the preschool years. Developmental Science, 18(6), 957–971. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12271
Desoete, A., Baten, E., Vercaemst, V., De Busschere, A., Baudonck, M., & Vanhaeke, J. (2019). Metacognition and motivation as predictors for mathematics performance of Belgian elementary school children. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 51(4), 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01020-w
Dinsmore, D. L. (2017). Examining the ontological and epistemic assumptions of research on metacognition, self-regulation and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 37(9), 1125–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1333575
Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the Conceptual Lens on Metacognition, Self-regulation, and Self-regulated Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6
Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Pezzi, A., & Kalisz, D. E. (2021). The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 123, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.042
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., & Pattnaik, D. (2020). Forty-five years of Journal of Business Research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.039
Drigas, A., & Mitsea, E. (2020). The 8 Pillars of Metacognition. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(21), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i21.14907
Duque, P., & Cervantes-Cervantes, L.-S. (2019). Responsabilidad Social Universitaria: una revisión sistemática y análisis bibliométrico. Estudios Gerenciales, 451–464. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2019.153.3389
Duque, P., & Oliva, E. J. D. (2022). Tendencias emergentes en la literatura sobre el compromiso del cliente: un análisis bibliométrico. Estudios Gerenciales, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2022.162.4528
Duque, P., Meza, O. E., Giraldo, D., & Barreto, K. (2021). Economía Social y Economía Solidaria: un análisis bibliométrico y revisión de literatura. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 138, e75566–e75566. https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.75566
Duque, P., Trejos, D., Hoyos, O., & Mesa, J. C. C. (2021). Finanzas corporativas y sostenibilidad: un análisis bibliométrico e identificación de tendencias. Semestre Económico, 24(56), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v24n56a1
Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of Metacognition with Motivation and Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645
Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 304. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816
Fishovitz, J., Crawford, G. L., & Kloepper, K. D. (2020). Guided Heads-Up: A Collaborative Game that Promotes Metacognition and Synthesis of Material While Emphasizing Higher-Order Thinking. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(3), 681–688. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00904
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In The Nature of Intelligence. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1570291225421995776
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. The American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Freeman, L. C. (1977). A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543
Gascoine, L., Higgins, S., & Wall, K. (2017). The assessment of metacognition in children aged 4-16 years: a systematic review. Review of Education, 5(1), 3–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3077
Georghiades, P. (2004). From the general to the situated: three decades of metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(3), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119401
Gliga, T., & Southgate, V. (2016). Metacognition: Pre-verbal Infants Adapt Their Behaviour to Their Knowledge States [Review of Metacognition: Pre-verbal Infants Adapt Their Behaviour to Their Knowledge States]. Current Biology: CB, 26(22), R1191–R1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.065
Goupil, L., & Kouider, S. (2016). Behavioral and Neural Indices of Metacognitive Sensitivity in Preverbal Infants. Current Biology: CB, 26(22), 3038–3045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.004
Goupil, L., Romand-Monnier, M., & Kouider, S. (2016). Infants ask for help when they know they don’t know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(13), 3492–3496. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515129113
Heyes, C., Bang, D., Shea, N., Frith, C. D., & Fleming, S. M. (2020). Knowing Ourselves Together: The Cultural Origins of Metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(5), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.007
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
Homolak, J., Kodvanj, I., & Virag, D. (2020). Preliminary analysis of COVID-19 academic information patterns: a call for open science in the times of closed borders. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2687–2701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03587-2
Hoyos, O., Castro Duque, M., León, N. T., Salazar, D. T., Montoya-Restrepo, L. A., Montoya-Restrepo, I. A., & Duque, P. (2023). Gobierno corporativo y desarrollo sostenible: un análisis bibliométrico. Revista CEA, 9(19), e2190–e2190. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.2190
Hoyos, O., Duque, P., García, D., & Giraldo, S. (2022). Producción científica sobre economía verde y sostenibilidad: una revisión de la investigación mundial. FACES. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, 30(2), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.18359/rfce.5846
Hurtado, P. D., & Ortiz, D. O. (2022). Perspectivas y tendencias de investigación en emprendimiento social. Desarrollo Gerencial, 14(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17081/dege.14.1.5082
Jiang, L., & Yu, S. (2021). Understanding Changes in EFL Teachers’ Feedback Practice During COVID-19: Implications for Teacher Feedback Literacy at a Time of Crisis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00583-9
Jiménez-Taracido, L., Manzanal Martinez, A. I., & Baridon Chauvie, D. G. (2019). Reading literacy and metacognition in a Spanish Adult Education centre. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 10(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.OJS169
Kuzle, A. (2018). Assessing metacognition of grade 2 and grade 4 students using an adaptation of multi-method interview approach during mathematics problem-solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0227-1
Lavi, R., Shwartz, G., & Dori, Y. J. (2019). Metacognition in chemistry education: A literature review. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59(6–7). https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201800087
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
Levy, S. J. (2002). Revisiting the marketing domain. European Journal of Marketing, 36(3), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560210417129
Lingel, K., Lenhart, J., & Schneider, W. (2019). Metacognition in mathematics: do different metacognitive monitoring measures make a difference? ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 51(4), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01062-8
Ma, W., & Luo, Q. (2021). Pedagogical practice and students’ perceptions of fully online flipped instruction during COVID-19. Oxford Review of Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.1994382
Mathieu, B., Sebastien, H., & Mathieu, J. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
McDowell, L. D. (2019). The roles of motivation and metacognition in producing self-regulated learners of college physical science: a review of empirical studies. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2524–2541. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1689584
Meier, F. (2020). Social Network Analysis as a Tool for Data Analysis and Visualization in Information Behaviour and Interactive Information Retrieval Research. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, 10, 477–480. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343413.3378018
Mogollón, J. O., Andrade, J. M. M., & Duque, P. (2022). Responsabilidad social empresarial y América Latina: una revisión de literatura. Equidad Y Desarrollo, 1(40), 3. https://doi.org/10.19052/eq.vol1.iss40.3
Nelson, T. O. (1990). Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
Oh, H.-K. (2019). Impact of Metacognition on Clinical Judgment and Competence in Simulation-Based Blended Learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 11(3), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2019070106
Ohri, A. (2012). R for Business Analytics. Springer Science and Business Media. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=D2Su4qomE4sC
Ohtani, K., & Hisasaka, T. (2018). Beyond intelligence: a meta-analytic review of the relationship among metacognition, intelligence, and academic performance. Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 179–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9183-8
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3
Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2018). An assessment-based model for exploring the solving of mathematical problems: Utilizing revised Bloom’s taxonomy and facets of metacognition. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.004
Ramos-Enríquez, V., Duque, P., & Salazar, J. A. V. (2021). Responsabilidad Social Corporativa y Emprendimiento: evolución y tendencias de investigación. Desarrollo Gerencial, 13(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.17081/dege.13.1.4210
Restrepo, C. A. D., Patiño, M., Duque, P., Cervantes, L. S. C., & Rivera, A. F. (2023). Financial Performance in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): A Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Production. Apuntes del Cenes, 42(75). https://doi.org/10.19053/01203053.v42.n75.2023.14714
Rivers, M. L. (2021). Metacognition About Practice Testing: a Review of Learners’ Beliefs, Monitoring, and Control of Test-Enhanced Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 823–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09578-2
Robledo, S., Duque, P., & Aguirre, A. M. G. (2023). Word of Mouth Marketing: A Scientometric Analysis. Warsan Wichai Witthayasat / Khana Witthayasat Chulalongkon Mahawitthayalai = The Journal of Scientific Research / Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, 11(3), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.3.47
Robledo, S., Zuluaga, M., Valencia-Hernandez, L.-A., Arbelaez-Echeverri, O. A.-E., Duque, P., & Alzate-Cardona, J.-D. (2022). Tree of Science with Scopus: A Shiny Application. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 100. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2698
Rodríguez, A. M. B., Hurtado, P. L. D., & Villegas, V. L. M. (2022). Neurociencia y comportamiento del consumidor: análisis estadístico de su evolución y tendencias en su investigación. Cuadernos Latinoamericanos de Administración, 18(35). https://doi.org/10.18270/cuaderlam.v18i35.3855
Roebers, C. M., Kälin, S., & Aeschlimann, E. A. (2020). A comparison of non-verbal and verbal indicators of young children’s metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 15(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09217-4
Schneider, W., & Artelt, C. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0240-2
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1/2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
Smith, J. M., & Mancy, R. (2018). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive and collaborative talk during group mathematical problem-solving – what do we mean by collaborative metacognition? Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2017.1410215
Spiess, M. A., Meier, B., & Roebers, C. M. (2016). Development and longitudinal relationships between children’s executive functions, prospective memory, and metacognition. Cognitive Development, 38, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.02.003
Tsai, P.-Y., Yang, T.-T., She, H.-C., & Chen, S.-C. (2019). Leveraging College Students’ Scientific Evidence-Based Reasoning Performance with Eye-Tracking-Supported Metacognition. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(6), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09791-x
Valencia-Hernandez, D. S., Robledo, S., Pinilla, R., Duque-Méndez, N. D., & Olivar-Tost, G. (2020). SAP Algorithm for Citation Analysis: An improvement to Tree of Science. Ingeniería E Investigación, 40(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v40n1.77718
Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2019). Effect of a metacognitive scaffolding on self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement in e-learning environments. Knowledge Management and E-Learning: An International Journal, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.001
van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2015). Improving primary teachers’ attitudes toward science by attitude-focused professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 710–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21218
Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2004.12.001
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. J. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: pathways to achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4
Wallis, W. D. (2007). A Beginner’s Guide to Graph Theory (Springer (Ed.)). Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4580-9
Walwyn, D. R., & Combrinck, C. (2021). Epistemic justice during a global pandemic: Transforming curricula and pedagogical practices to improve student experiences of innovation studies. Industry and Higher Education, 35(5), 598–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422220987088
Wang, A. H., Firmender, J. M., Power, J. R., & Byrnes, J. P. (2016). Understanding the Program Effectiveness of Early Mathematics Interventions for Prekindergarten and Kindergarten Environments: A Meta-Analytic Review. Early Education and Development, 27(5), 692–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1116343
Wang, C.-Y. (2015). Exploring General Versus Task-Specific Assessments of Metacognition in University Chemistry Students: A Multitrait–Multimethod Analysis. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9436-8
White, H. D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author co-citation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 54(5), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10228
Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pasternak, D. P., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., Almeqdad, Q., & Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9033-1
Yang, S., Keller, F. B., & Zheng, L. (2016). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Examples. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802847
Zepeda, C. D., Richey, J. E., Ronevich, P., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015). Direct instruction of metacognition benefits adolescent science learning, transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 954–970. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000022
Zhang, J., & Luo, Y. (2017). Degree Centrality, Betweenness Centrality, and Closeness Centrality in Social Network. Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Modelling, Simulation and Applied Mathematics (MSAM2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/msam-17.2017.68
Zhang, Y., Ma, X., & Wang, L. (2020). The Determinants of Private Tutoring Participation for Mathematics in China: Focusing on the Role of Student Metacognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00603
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining Self-Regulation. In Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–39). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Educación y Educadores
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Esta revista y sus artículos se publican bajo la licencia CreativeCommons CC BY 4.0 DEED Atribución 4.0 Internacional, usted es libre de: Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente. Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente. La licencia no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia.
